Posts Tagged ‘Vonage’

 
 

More on Vonage

Monday, March 26th, 2007

While the dust is still settling about the Vonage injunction it’s still premature to say that VoIP-as-we-know-it is over.

That’s the view of SunRocket’s Brian Lustig.

’It’s important to note that every Internet phone service provider has their own distinct architecture for their network,” he says. “It’s constructed differently, done in its own unique way. So each provider has to do their own analysis.”

The bottom line: “It would be inappropriate to assume that what applies to other [VoIP] companies applies to all companies.”

SunRocket recently signed up its 200,000th customer. Not perhaps in Vonage’s league, but healthy four-fold growth since 2006. The company is taking a “strategic” approach to growth, says Lustig. “It’s a deliberate strategy to keep costs in check.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
 
 

Verizon KOs Vonage

Friday, March 23rd, 2007

It looks like Chicken Little was right.

The sky is falling and Foxy Woxy Verizon is going to snap off Vonage’s head with a permanent injunction that bids fair to shut down the VoIP provider.

Now I’m certainly no expert on intellectual property law so I’ll leave comment about the legal ins and outs to the lawyers.

But as a citizen, I think there’s something here that gets to the heart of the whole notion of intellectual property.

Nobody disputes your right to the opportunity to make money from your inventions — think Thomas Edison and the incandescent light bulb. It’s not an abstract valuation of human creativity. It’s an incentive to bring new inventions to market that make life better, easier, more enjoyable. Even the Chinese have come round to recognize that patent and copyright protection is to their advantage in the long run.

But suppose Edison had patented the light bulb so he could prevent other people from using the technology while he continued to make a killing in his candle-manufacturing monopoly?

Closer to the present, suppose Tim Berners-Lee had patented the World Wide Web and socked the technology away so he could slap a patent infringement lawsuit on everyone creating an accessible user interface for the Internet? You probably wouldn’t be reading the New York Times — or me, for that matter — online.

Let’s face it. If we waited for Verizon to deliver VoIP, we’d still be waiting. Ten years ago when pioneers were going out on a limb experimenting with IP for voice communications Verizon was nowhere to be found.

And now that I think about it, maybe Verizon needs to answer to us, the people, about why they had this technology and didn’t use it to give us low-cost phone calls. Or the other features that are now commonplace with VoIP — free voicemail, call waiting, caller ID or voicemail-to-email.

Verizon may have won in the court of law but in the court of public opinion, the jury is still deliberating.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
 
 

Is Vonage on the Prowl?

Monday, February 5th, 2007

Vonage stock is anchored at all time lows, about a third of the IPO price, and there’s no absence of speculation about the consumer VoIP pioneer’s future. Today, David Shabelman’s piece, “Clock Ticks for Internet Provider Vonage,” — thanks to reader Larry Lisser who alerted me to this — speculates that Vonage may be looking to grow by aquisition.

Some of the targets are consumer VoIP competitors like SunRocket and Packet8. Personally, I can’t imagine a worse marriage-made-in-hell than high flying, free spending Vonage mated with conservative, technology focused Packet8.

But Shabelman also offers up some more interesting possibilities. Vonage could be looking at acquisition targets that would let the company offer customers new, rich services. He names Iotum, Talkster, SightSpeed and Covad as possibilities.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
 
 

Is Skype for Business Ready for Prime Time?

Monday, November 20th, 2006

Skype didn’t invent Internet phone calls. But the Luxembourg-based subsidiary of Internet auction giant EBay has brought VoIP to the masses, boasting that hundreds of millions of people around the world have downloaded its free software.

In the past six months, Skype has taken steps to expand its presence from the consumer market to business users. But some say that Skype’s business offering doesn’t make the grade for business use.

Skype’s software-based service makes it an attractive choice for road warriors who can use their Skype service anyplace they have a broadband Internet connection.

Skype also makes sense for small businesses because in many cases people already have Skype accounts at home, eliminating the need for additional training. “Skype did a survey of its users,” says Skype spokeswoman Erica Jostedt, “and found that about 30 percent of people were using Skype to save money and streamline communications for their business.”

The provider sees the opportunity to grow in the SMB market and last spring announced major enhancements to its Skype for Business offering. These include a dedicated website for business users, Skype-compatible hardware from other manufacturers, and an expanded Skype for Business Control Panel to manage groups of users and pre-paid services.

Skype is making the service more attractive with new management features and better integration with desktop tools like Microsoft Outlook and Web conferencing services. The provider is also promoting its ability to increase efficiency with features like presence-awareness — similar to the way IM programs let users know which of their contacts are online. Presence-awareness is not typically offered by business phone systems.

Further, an “ecosystem” of equipment is growing up around Skype.

Manufacturers including Cisco-Linksys, Polycom, US Robotics, Plantronics are now offering Skype handsets so using the service has the familiar “look and feel.” British Columbia-based EQO connects Skype service to mobile phones while Danville-based TelEvolution recently introduced a Skype-compatible version of its PhoneGnome that combines VoIP service with conventional phone line automatically, in a single device.

“I’m seeing in so many cases where executives are using VoIP at home — whether it’s through a service provider like Vonage or Packet8 or services like Skype or Yahoo — and, because of the savings, they say, ‘can I bring this into my business?”‘ says Nick Pegley, VP of Marketing at All Covered, a Redwood Shores-based provider of IT services for small businesses.

As a result, Skype is a growing presence in the business environment, Pegly says. “Nobody really knows what the numbers are, but there is a growing number of users out there in business.” About ten percent of Televolution’s customers have started using Skype since the Skype-compatible PhoneGnome became available since May, reports company Founder and CEO David Beckemeyer.

The Linksys division of Cisco, which also recently introduced a cordless Skype handset, illustrates the way Skype is penetrating the business environment.

“A lot of the companies we work with in the Far East are using Skype,” explains Linksys VP of Product Marketing Mani Dhillon. “They were the ones who got us interested in Skype because they wanted to use it to communicate with us. Victor Tsao [Linksys co-founder, senior Vice President and General Manager] was using Skype to communicate with our manufacturers as well as our engineering team.”

And easier voice communications aren’t the only benefit. “Instant messaging and file transfer make Skype and even more valuable tool,” explains Skype Director of Operations Michael Jackson. “It helps collaboration phenomenally.”

But while Skype offers clear benefits, some say that Skype doesn’t fit the bill for business use.

Skype isn’t a good fit for business communications, says All Covered’s Pegley, because the service “doesn’t really deliver what a fully fledged business solution like Avaya or Nortel can. There are many business-class solutions out there at every price point. Skype has to evolve a lot before it’s going to get there.”

Critics point to security and call quality as two areas of concern. Further, some question the long-term viability of Skype’s architecture, which is based on a closed, proprietary protocol rather than an open standard.

To understand how Skype both benefits business users and, at the same time, opens up new vulnerabilities for voice communications, you have to understand how its infrastructure differs from VoIP phone services like Vonage.

While Vonage places calls through a central server, individual Skype users connect directly via their PCs — “peer-to-peer” — without a central server. It’s similar to instant messaging applications like AIM. This architecture is highly resilient because service doesn’t depend on any single part of the network. But it also means new security risks.

“Voice traffic on the Internet is subject to the same attacks as data,” says Vincent Weafer, Symantec Sr. Dir. Symantec Security Response. “Skype sits on a traditional PC, so malware like keylogging [capturing user keystrokes for information like passwords] can ’see’ Skype calls. We do see the underground channels are trading Skype passwords and user IDs.” And like other Internet communications, Skype is vulnerable to denial of service attacks, phishing and other types of fraud.

“Skype is widely popular,” Weafer adds. “By its nature it will be an attractive target.”

In addition, compliance with legal regulations can also be an issue, says All Covered’s Pegley. “In businesses where phone calls have to be recorded for legal compliance — financial services for example — if people are using Skype, the calls are not going through a controlled process.”

But in the end, these risks are “generic” risks inherent in Internet communications, says Skype’s Jackson and he agrees that Skype isn’t the right solution for every business.

“It’s not the right solution for the stock exchange or the ministry of defense,” he says. “We’re not targeting being the communications systems for IBM. It is the right solution for a small workgroup to increase productivity.”

One place where Skype does do better than other VoIP providers is call encryption, says Symantec’s Weafer. “Skype has put a lot of effort into protecting traffic from eavesdropping,” he says. “Skype uses encrypted traffic. Eavesdropping is possible but very difficult.”

Quality of service is second issue that comes up as Skype moves into the workplace.

“How can you assure quality on a network that’s based on peer-to-peer architecture?” asks Erik Lagerway, CTO of Shift Networks, a small business hosted VoIP phone service. “Quality assurance is hard to deliver for a group of business users. If you have a DSL link and you’re making a phone call while you’re downloading documents, you’re going to have a hard time convincing me that you’ll have enough bandwidth left over for a real conversation.”

“You need a different model for business than for consumers,” Lagerway says, adding that to assure the level of performance that businesses need, “it comes down to a managed network.”

Skype’s Jackson doesn’t deny that managed networks can offer call quality advantages over shared networks, but points out that the evolution of high bandwidth Internet connections are rapidly changing the picture.

“Three or four years ago, a call would really fill the pipe,” he explains. “Now people are listening to Internet radio. A phone call takes a fraction of that bandwidth.”

But beyond concerns about Skype security and quality, critics say that the company’s communications protocol limits the growth of the Skype eco-system. In a world where SIP — Session Initiation Protocol, the evolving open standard for multimedia communications — is increasingly being embraced, Skype’s proprietary protocol is a “silo in the meadow of communication” according to Shift Networks’ Lagerway.

“Think of email and how it started,” he explains. “It was ruled by CompuServe, ATTmail, MCImail and X.400. Those were closed proprietary systems and they eventually lost. Something simple and open won: SMTP, Simple Mail Transfer Protocol. SMTP is now ubiquitous and is the protocol of choice for all email solutions.”

But Skype’s Jackson points to the company’s proprietary communications model as a benefit for business users because it makes calls more secure.

“We think that’s an advantage,” he says. “When we designed Skype we wanted calls to be secure and we felt that a proprietary protocol all the way along was best.” And, he adds, Skype is not “religiously against” SIP. “In fact all our SkypeOut calls [calls from Skype to the PSTN] use SIP,” he adds.

In the end, Skype is looking to its sheer presence in the marketplace to deliver compelling advantages for its customers.

“The more users we have, the more development can be supported, which in turn supports more users,” says Jackson. “The Net is important for businesses and they’re increasing their investments in Internet connections because this is able to do so much more for them. Skype is just riding on that.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
 
 

If it Looks Like a Duck…

Wednesday, November 15th, 2006

Sometimes I wonder what would happen if PR folks wrote plain English.

Actually it’s not the PR people who are to blame for the blizzard of BS that obscures their communications. I know this from personal experience writing press releases for tech companies.

It’s the marketing gurus who can’t accept that there’s nothing wrong with selling something that has a name and is well understood. A telephone, for example.

Whatever its shortcomings, Vonage understands this, calling its service “broadband telephone.”

But the folks at Skype apparently don’t think that we would get excited by a Skype telephone. So today, in addition to announcing the Skype for Mac beta, the company also announced “a stylish and practical platform” that “makes it easy to enjoy Internet calls without any need for a computer.” Maybe I’m missing something, but that sounds like a telephone to me.

The new offering includes the SMC Wi-Fi Phone for Skype, FON’s wireless router “La Fonera,” 500 minutes of SkypeOut credit, and Skype Voicemail for a year. Priced at 139 euros ($159.99 in the U.S., £99 in the UK), the bundle is sold exclusively through the Skype online store.

This makes good marketing sense because you’re probably unlikely to get granny to gear up with a headset and a laptop to talk to the grandchildren. (Unless your granny is Grace Hopper.) This is the insight behind Packet8’s videophone, whose most devoted audience is grandparents who want to ’see’ distant grandkids but are never going to step up to webcams.

However, I can see another side to the Skype telephone that the folks in Luxembourg may not be so happy about. Once it looks like telephone, and works like a telephone, it’s inevitable that someone will expect it to act like a telephone and make a 911 call.

So far services like Skype have been exempted from 911 calling requirements because they don’t operate like conventional telephones. But once they look and act like telephones, I’ll be surprised if they’re not forced to work like them, too.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
 
 

Copyright © 2003-2009 Voxilla. All Rights Reserved.