<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Is Skype a Bad Network Neighbor?</title> <atom:link href="http://voxilla.com/2006/12/02/is-skype-bad-network-neighbor-102/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://voxilla.com/2006/12/02/is-skype-bad-network-neighbor-102</link> <description>VoIP and mobile communications news and information</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: jbond</title><link>http://voxilla.com/2006/12/02/is-skype-bad-network-neighbor-102/comment-page-1#comment-54</link> <dc:creator>jbond</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 09:23:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=102#comment-54</guid> <description>This is all FUD, isn&#039;t it?- Skype shares bandwidth if a client become a supernode. But you can&#039;t become a supernode unless you have a full peer internet connection. Which means no firewall and no NAT. Which means no corporate PCs, because they&#039;ll all be behind a corporate firewall and NAT. So this whole story about Skype using corporate bandwidth without asking because of it&#039;s P2P roots is pure FUD, isn&#039;t it?- That whole paragraph about Chinese hackers is idle speculation.  Now that can be entertaining, but it&#039;s not proof of anything.- Then there&#039;s Firefox being a top security risk. Um, compared with what?Perhaps you should ask who paid for all those reports from Gartner, and Bit9 and similar Skype scare stories from around the world. It&#039;s not exactly unknown for analysts to write a story that suits their primary customers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all FUD, isn&#8217;t it?</p><p>- Skype shares bandwidth if a client become a supernode. But you can&#8217;t become a supernode unless you have a full peer internet connection. Which means no firewall and no NAT. Which means no corporate PCs, because they&#8217;ll all be behind a corporate firewall and NAT. So this whole story about Skype using corporate bandwidth without asking because of it&#8217;s P2P roots is pure FUD, isn&#8217;t it?</p><p>- That whole paragraph about Chinese hackers is idle speculation.  Now that can be entertaining, but it&#8217;s not proof of anything.</p><p>- Then there&#8217;s Firefox being a top security risk. Um, compared with what?</p><p>Perhaps you should ask who paid for all those reports from Gartner, and Bit9 and similar Skype scare stories from around the world. It&#8217;s not exactly unknown for analysts to write a story that suits their primary customers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 349/367 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via N/A

Served from: voxilla.com @ 2012-02-10 02:42:13 -->
